The Concept of Bughat in Islamic Political Fiqh
A Comparison of Madhhab Shafi'i and Hanafi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53038/tsyr.v5i1.435Keywords:
Bughat, Mazhab Syafi'i, Mazhab Hanafi, Ta'wil, At-Thalab, Rebellion in Fiqh, Legal Derivation Methods, Government StabilityAbstract
This study examines the differing perspectives of the Mazhab Shafi’i and Hanafi regarding the concept of bughat (rebellion) within Islamic political jurisprudence. The core issue lies in the variation of criteria, legal treatment, and evidential bases used by the two schools. Using a library research method, analyzing classical sources, relevant hadiths such as those indicating early signs of rebellion (at-thalab), and major fiqh works, the study finds that the Mazhab Shafi’i requires the presence of military strength, leadership, and legitimate ta’wil to classify a group as bughat, and distinguishes between Muslim and non-Muslim rebels, prioritizing peaceful resolution. In contrast, the Mazhab Hanafi emphasizes governmental stability and allows pre-emptive defensive measures once signs of rebellion appear, without differentiating religious status. These differences stem from each Mazhab’s method of legal derivation. The findings highlight the significant implications of these methodological variations for the application of Islamic public law in contemporary political contexts.
References
Abidin, Muhammad Amin ibn. Hasyiyah Radd Al-Mukhtar, Juz IV. Mesir: Maktabah al-Baby al-Halaby, 1996.
Al-Ghozaly. Al-Wasith Fil Mazhab, Juz Ke-Enam. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyah, 1997.
Al-Jaziry, Abdurrahman. Al-Fiqh ‘Ala Al-Madzahib Al-Arba’Ah. Juz V. Beirut: Darul Fikr, 1999.
Al-Qudamah, Syeikh Ahmad. Al-Mughniy, Juz X. Beirut: Dar al-Fiqr, 1992.
Almumtazah, Hurun Sajidah, and Tajul Arifin. “Tindak Pidana Pemberontakan dalam Perspektif Hadits.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) 4, no. 2 (2024): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v4i2.18530.
Aziz, Abdul. “Istirātījiyyah Murshidī Al-Dīn Fī Manʿ Al-Zawāj Al-Mubakkir Bisabab Al-Ḥaml Khārij Iṭār Al-Zawāj Fī Jākartā Al-Sharqiyyah.” Al-Zahra: Journal for Islamic and Arabic Studies 21, no. 2 (2024): 237–258. https://doi.org/10.15408/zr.v21i2.41899.
Aziz, Abdul, and Hakim, Lukman. “Conversion to Islam as a Strategy for Legalizing Marriage: Experiences of Interfaith Couples in East Jakarta.” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum 58, no. 1 (2024): 47–86. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v58i1.1391.
Aziz, Abdul, and Mutakin, Ali. “Criticism of Mixed Marriage and Child Citizenship Rights: Family Law Reform in Indonesia.” SHAHIH: Journal of Islamicate Multidisciplinary 9, no. 2 (2024): 117–138. https://doi.org/10.22515/shahih.v9i2.10111.
Bahnasi, Ahmad Fathi. Al-Hudud Fi Asy-Syari‘ah Al-Islamiyyah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1978.
Elviani, Akmal Munir, and Khairunnas Jamal. “Konsep Bughat dalam Al- Qur’an dan Bentuk -Bentuknya dalam Sejarah Pemerintahan Islam (Kajian Tafsir Maudhu’i).” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 9, no. 1 (2025): 1584–94.
Hamzah, Saidin, and Hamrina. “Khulafah Al- Rasyidun : Masa Kepemimpinan Ali bin Abi Thalib.” CARITA: Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya 1, no. 2 (2022): 129–38.
Harissalam. “Perspective Imam Madzhab on Bughat Elements Unsur-Unsur Bughat Perspektif Pandangan Imam Madzahab.” JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial 2, no. 1 (2020): 29–34. https://doi.org/10.51486/jbo.v2i1.44.
Irfan, Nurul, and Masyrofah. Fiqh Jinayah. Jakarta: PT. Amzah, 2013.
Ishak, Mohd Said. Hudud dalam Fiqh Islam. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2003.
Maksum, Ghufron“Telaah Kritis Terhadap Praktik Perkawinan di Bawah Tangan di Indonesia”. Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi Antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam, vol. 16, no. 1, Apr. 2017, pp. 63-86, https://doi.org/10.15408/kordinat.v16i1.6455.
Maksum, Ghufron, and Nur Isyanto. “Fenomena Penafsiran Al-Qur’an Di Media Sosial: Analisis Kompetensi Keilmuan Dan Etika Dakwah”. Alashriyyah, vol. 11, no. 2, Oct. 2025, pp. 365-78, doi:10.53038/alashriyyah.v11i2.245.
Muslich, Ahmad Wardi. Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.
Pratama, Tegar, and Dian Prayoga. “Masa Pemerintahan Ali bin Abi Thalib dari Tahun 655-660 M.” Jazirah: Jurnal Peradaban dan Kebudayaan 4, no. 2 (2023): 111–18. https://doi.org/10.51190/jazirah. v4i2.82.
Putra, Dian Dwi Ok. “Hukuman bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Bughat (Studi Komperatif antara Imam Syafi’i dan Imam Abu Hanifah),” 2011.
Qudratuddarsi, Hilman, Eli Meivawati, and Risman Saputra. “Pelatihan Penelitian Metode Kuantitatif dan Systematic Literature Review bagi Dosen dan Mahasiswa.” Beru’-Beru’: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat 3, no. 1 (2024): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.31605/jipm.v3i1.4437.
Rustam, and Sukring. “Pemberontakan terhadap Pemerintahan yang Sah (Bugah) dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan 16, no. 1 (2016): 67–83. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v16i1.67-83.
Sagara, Bayu, Alvi Mahessa, Robby Agus Pratama, and Fardan Ardinata. “Siyasah Syariyah dan Fiqih Siyasah.” MARAS: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin 2, no. 1 (2024): 380–86. https://doi.org/10.60126/maras.v2i1.185.
Sahrasad, Herdi. “Arab Spring: Perubahan Rezim dan Tegangan Hubungan AS-Dunia Arab Refleksi Sosio-Historis.” Jurnal CMES: Center of Middle Eastern Studies 6, no. 1 (2013): 36–54.
Syafi’i. “Al-Bughot dalam Perspektif Mazhab Fiqh.” Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam 16, no. 2 (2017): 205–20. https://doi.org/10.15408/kordinat.v16i2.6439.
Syafi, Al-imam. Al-Umm. Gresik, Indonesia: PT Pustaka Tarjamah Turats Arabi, 2025.
Wibowo, Prihandono. “Karbala dan Gaza: Simbol Perlawanan terhadap Kedzaliman.” The Insiera Insight 1, no. 5 (2024).
Zuhaily, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Wa Adillatuha, Juz Ke-Enam, Cet. Ke-Tiga. Bairut: Darul Fikr, 1989.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zuairiyah Zuairiyah, Fathiyah Husna, Kamila Nayli Azzahra, Attikah Ulyani, Siyono Siyono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
By virtue of their appearance in this is open access jurnal, articles are free to use after initial publication under a Creative Commons Atribution 4.0 International Licenses.







